(2021-11-11, 1:56)N. W. Perry Wrote: I meant the second, but it may actually be both in this case.
I think I fixed it, how's this:
It's still 12 off but that's because of the universal joints.
I'm thinking about introducing a shadow meta to exclude certain parts from counts (e.g. the joint ends, so it only counts the joiners using an alternative part).