From Willy: Define a standard for helper parts


RE: From Willy: Define a standard for helper parts
#17
(2021-08-20, 20:05)Travis Cobbs Wrote: There should be no need for an explicit !CATEGORY meta-statment based on the proposed names. It will automatically be in the Helper category. I don't use LDCad, but hopefully it already correctly implements this behavior. If CATEGORY == <Whatever> does not work in LDCad for parts without an explicit !CATEGORY meta-statement, then I would suggest requesting that LDCad be fixed.

About LDCAD: I don't know, I'm not the author... I thought it generally (as having some years of experience with databases): if some meta information is static in time, it's always a benefit to mention it clearly as an extra field, for practical reasons. Just my 2 cents for this brainstorming.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: From Willy: Define a standard for helper parts - by Milan Vančura - 2021-08-22, 7:37

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 35 Guest(s)