LDView Simplified boxes


RE: Simplified boxes
#11
(2021-06-12, 23:58)Michael Horvath Wrote: Python 3.x is not backwards-compatible with Python 2.x. They're *not* designed to work together. That being said, I'm surprised there were no errors. Can you attach the model to your next post so I can figure out what is going on?

There's no real need. The only difference between the boxed model and the original was the addition of the boxing summary:

Code:
0 // Boxed 3 parts (b\t).
0 // Boxed 6 parts (b\b).
0 // Boxed 5 parts (b\a).
0 // Boxed Total 14/74 (18.9%) parts by LDBoxer v2018g.
0 // Elapsed time: 00:00:00.
0

Everything else remained the same.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-12, 3:09
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-12, 4:51
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-12, 4:54
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-12, 4:55
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-12, 5:23
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-12, 5:34
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-12, 20:29
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-12, 20:29
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-12, 20:40
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-12, 23:58
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-13, 0:52
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-13, 1:23
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-13, 2:42
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-13, 15:43
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-14, 5:22
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-14, 21:58
RE: Simplified boxes - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-06-14, 22:09
RE: Simplified boxes - by Michael Horvath - 2021-06-15, 5:09

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)