Search path discussion


RE: Search path discussion
#11
(2021-03-17, 1:54)Trevor Sandy Wrote: Since LDraw.org does not author any applications why not define specifications in a manner that support both scenarios as they are both valid? This way, application developers can decide if to support either or both approaches and LDraw.org could focus on qualifying how unofficial file load/parse under each scope should be implemented, pros, cons etc...

Ideally we want the spec to fully specify exactly what should happen when loading any LDraw file. Having two possible results, where the file looks completely different depending on which program loaded it is bad.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Search path discussion - by Orion Pobursky - 2021-03-16, 13:26
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-03-16, 22:11
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-03-16, 22:09
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-03-17, 2:01
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-03-17, 19:27
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-04-14, 18:09
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2021-04-15, 20:14
RE: Search path discussion - by Cam's Bricks - 2022-03-15, 11:08
RE: Search path discussion - by N. W. Perry - 2022-03-15, 17:12
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2022-03-15, 21:34
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2022-03-16, 16:37
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2022-03-16, 23:53
RE: Search path discussion - by Travis Cobbs - 2022-03-19, 21:02

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)