Request on part 6089


RE: Request on part 6919
#14
(2020-10-12, 11:36)GeraldĀ Lasser Wrote: I would make it thinner, the 2x2 dish available is around 2.4 LDU think, go in that direction

Here's how I constructed the handle, you can then basicall replace the "top" file.

The file includes a LDD overlay.

Yes, I think it should have the same overall proportions as the 2x2 dish. The bowl just a bit thinner/shallower, and the collar around the shaft a bit taller. Overall height 12 LDU (it's now 12.5, so that's negligible).

And I think the stud2 should indeed be flush with the rim, otherwise you'd get collisions with the inner surface of the dish.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Request on part 6089 - by Mikkel Bech Jensen - 2013-11-16, 21:44
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 2:01
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-08, 7:30
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 13:20
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-08, 16:09
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 20:01
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-08, 20:21
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-08, 20:40
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-12, 5:54
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-12, 11:36
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-12, 15:13
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Gerald Lasser - 2020-10-12, 15:48
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-12, 22:18
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2020-10-13, 14:35
RE: Request on part 6919 - by N. W. Perry - 2021-06-13, 14:04
RE: Request on part 6919 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2021-06-13, 15:05

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)