Thinking about doing a LDCad 1.7 version


RE: Thinking about doing a LDCad 1.7 version
(2020-08-20, 0:54)N. W. Perry Wrote: Yeah, it would make sense to have an exception for generated flexible parts, since the standard LDraw header doesn't have a category for those (though it does have a qualifier for flexible sections).

In a way, it's really more about having the OMR-checking programs not throw an error for flexible parts, or maybe allow it to the LDCad clean-up dialog, just to make MPDCenter happy. Smile

I don't feel the !LDRAW_ORG implies anything but file type.
Therefore 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Model is fine.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Thinking about doing a LDCad 1.7 version - by Orion Pobursky - 2020-08-20, 1:12

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)