(2020-07-07, 7:18).Vincent Messenet Wrote: @Magnus, could you please let me know here what the problem is with these files?
Thanks!
Yes, It looks like the PT "ate my homework". I have to recall my review from my memory.
Bricklink state that there's three versions of 2454. With or without a hollow stud blocker, and a third version is now in production with regular hollow studs.
Why did you choose a and b?
IMO it should be a, b and c, but OTOH I can't find any images of the version without a blocker. Does it even excist?
The new version have a logo on the inside of the hollow stud, so the s02 subfile can't include a stud primitive.
The stud blocker doesn't work well in hi-res mode. It also has unvisible surfaces, hidden on the inside.
You could use 4 x 3-16ndis around the bottom surface, and 2 x 1-8chrd on the top surface, instead.
The ridges are all too small and misplaced. The older version have ridges that block a center stud, but the new version allow a center stud.
These ridges should all touch the 2, or 3, stud configuration. There is no play between the ridges and the studs.
I don't see the point of eliminating T-junctions on the inside top surface.
I don't understand why you want to "plug the hole" with a disc primitive, in the new version, when a single big quad will do.
Remember, you should reduce the number of triangles in your files.
Lots of duplicated surfaces in -as01.
Missing edges in -bs01, along the ridges and inside the studs.
Did you inform Admin about the old file? It should become a Move to-file.