New ring primitive(s)


Re: New ring primitive(s)
#5
I know, I'm seven weeks late, but...
That's not a solution. In fact there isn't one, because we have no 1-6 primitives.

The real reason I'm replying here is because this got me thinking. Is it worth using three concentric ring primitives, especially for a partial ring? Is a slightly reduced file size worth tripling the number of quads used to draw the ring?

Creating a ring of any size with any number of segments is seconds work in Excel. That's how I created all the rim segments for 88517.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
New ring primitive(s) - by Damien Roux - 2012-01-01, 19:20
Re: New ring primitive(s) - by Tim Gould - 2012-01-01, 20:37
Re: New ring primitive(s) - by Ronald Vallenduuk - 2012-02-25, 0:12
Re: New ring primitive(s) - by Damien Roux - 2012-02-27, 15:28
Re: New ring primitive(s) - by Steffen - 2012-01-04, 19:40

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)