Require Bricklink ID for pattern parts


RE: Require Bricklink ID for pattern parts
#6
(2019-11-13, 5:42)Chris Dee Wrote: I agree. Is it OK to expect software to parse all the '0 !KEYWORDS' lines to find a bricklink xxxxx element or should we introduce a '0 !BRICKLINK' directive?

I don't think the we need a new meta. If we do go that route then it should probably be something more generic like 0 !CROSS_REF.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Require Bricklink ID for pattern parts - by Orion Pobursky - 2019-11-13, 15:57

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)