(2019-10-22, 23:51)N. W. Perry Wrote: Obviously I shouldn't be able to see through the hose that way, but I'm pretty sure I know why that is (the inner diameter of my end piece doesn't match that of the hose). So that's where I'm at; I'm sure there's a more correct way to do this, but I'm pretty much making this up as I go along.You need an inverted inner tube, because the outer tube is only visible from the outside due to BFC.
LDraw.org Discussion Forums
›
LDraw Programs
›
LDraw Editors and Viewers
Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad
Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad
Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by N. W. Perry - 2019-10-21, 22:59
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by Roland Melkert - 2019-10-21, 23:19
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by N. W. Perry - 2019-10-22, 0:49
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by Roland Melkert - 2019-10-22, 19:10
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by N. W. Perry - 2019-10-22, 23:51
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by Roland Melkert - 2019-10-23, 19:01
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by N. W. Perry - 2019-10-24, 2:44
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-10-24, 6:35
RE: Concerning "classic" hoses and LDCad - by N. W. Perry - 2019-10-24, 18:10
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)