Bicolor legs


RE: Bicolor legs
#7
(2019-01-01, 13:45)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: No, I think it should be like this:

The first half is a Part, to be placed in the Parts-folder. It has its own partnumber.
The second half is a subpart, to be placed in the s-folder.

The two halves are together a Part, to be placed in the Part-folder.
A two coloured Part = (Part + subpart), and this is not a Shortcut.

Is there already another example like this, where we have a Part inside a Part without it becoming a Shortcut?
I sincerely think that this scheme is needlessly complex. No benefit over using two subparts.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-01, 8:36
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-01, 9:57
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-01, 10:57
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-01, 11:39
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-01, 12:44
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-01, 13:45
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-01, 13:53
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-01, 17:26
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-02, 19:52
RE: Bicolor legs - by Willy Tschager - 2019-01-03, 20:56
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-01, 15:12
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-01, 17:10
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-05, 12:19
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-05, 14:35
RE: Bicolor legs - by Gerald Lasser - 2019-01-06, 0:29
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-19, 7:06
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-19, 16:10
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-19, 19:18
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-20, 15:08
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-20, 15:44
RE: Bicolor legs - by Magnus Forsberg - 2019-01-20, 16:57
RE: Bicolor legs - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-20, 17:10

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)