(2018-03-05, 20:02)Johann Eisner Wrote: Hi Tom
Both ways lead to the success.
For Philippe's way you need this code for example:
0 STEP
0 ROTSTEP 0 180 0 REL
0 BUFEXCHG A STORE
0 BUFEXCHG A RETRIEVE
0 STEP
Johann
The whole empty steps things comes from LPub ignoring duplicate step metas, because many people "abuse" the meta by having a normal step followed by a rotstep.
I think the main problem here is people don't realize the step meta is an indication of the END of a step not the beginning.
Those double steps, and thus empty steps, are very annoying in editors.
Or am I missing a genuine reason to have double step metas?