Is "Pattern" superfluous in Sticker part names?


Re: Is "Pattern" superfluous in Sticker part names?
#10
The first word of the part description isn't required to be the part's category, but according to the library header spec, if it isn't the part's category, then a !CATEGORY statement is required later in the header. My guess is that it's done this way due to the 64-character limit, but I can't remember for sure.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Is "Pattern" superfluous in Sticker part names? - by Travis Cobbs - 2011-12-19, 17:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)