Wigs 18639 or 92255?


RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255?
#4
(2017-06-14, 6:45)Jaco van der Molen Wrote:
(2017-06-13, 19:25)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Since they have the same name (WIG, STRAIGHT 1), yes, I think they are the same. The rendering of both images is the same too... So yet another alias!

So should we create 18639.dat as an alias of 92255? Or have you done this?
Please do it if you feel like it Wink
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Wigs 18639 or 92255? - by Jaco van der Molen - 2017-06-13, 19:10
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2017-06-14, 9:19

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)