(2017-06-14, 6:45)Jaco van der Molen Wrote:Please do it if you feel like it(2017-06-13, 19:25)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Since they have the same name (WIG, STRAIGHT 1), yes, I think they are the same. The rendering of both images is the same too... So yet another alias!
So should we create 18639.dat as an alias of 92255? Or have you done this?
Wigs 18639 or 92255?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
Wigs 18639 or 92255? - by Jaco van der Molen - 2017-06-13, 19:10
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2017-06-13, 19:25
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255? - by Jaco van der Molen - 2017-06-14, 6:45
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2017-06-14, 9:19
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)