just for completeness in case later somebody stumbles over this thread:
> So my question/observation shouldn't parts inside "p/" also use "p/stud.dat" as a reference in order to maintain consistency?
No, all primitives currently are always accessed without any prefix, i.e., instead of writing
p/someprimitive.dat
, all primitives are (from both PARTS\ and PARTS\S\ and P\) accessed by
someprimitive.dat
> So my question/observation shouldn't parts inside "p/" also use "p/stud.dat" as a reference in order to maintain consistency?
No, all primitives currently are always accessed without any prefix, i.e., instead of writing
p/someprimitive.dat
, all primitives are (from both PARTS\ and PARTS\S\ and P\) accessed by
someprimitive.dat