ldconfig.ldr - need magnet material

[Scott Wardlaw]

OK, I'm willing to make an exception based on the majority. For the record, it is still just a single part; though it has many forms.

If we add a new material...

We should probably allow some wiggle room. Instead of calling the material Magnet, it might be better to call it Porous_Metal. We already have Metal as a material (which can be assumed to be polished).

Thoughts on this?

Also, any thoughts on defining the properties (reflection, refraction, specular, roughness, etc.) of each of these materials, so that there is a common way to show them? Could that information be added to ldconfig without causing any programs to crash?

Thanks,
Scott W.