Part 87580 Naming


Re: Part 87580 Naming
#6
Until you pointed it out I hadn't noticed they were split apart as I always go looking for the jumper plate in tiles.

Categorisation is never going to be perfect for everyone but I do agree with you that the jumper _plate_s should be plates, if only for historical and common nomenclature reasons.

Although I also think 88000 (definitely) and probably 6576 should be tiles.

Tim
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Part 87580 Naming - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-05, 4:51
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 5:34
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Chris Dee - 2011-12-05, 13:59
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 14:20
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-05, 14:39
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 21:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)