Not sure I agree. It is more tile than plate by three to one.
Although by that argument 6576 should be a tile too and arguably 88000.
Tim
Although by that argument 6576 should be a tile too and arguably 88000.
Tim
Part 87580 Naming
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Part 87580 Naming - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-05, 4:51
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 5:34
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Chris Dee - 2011-12-05, 13:59
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 14:20
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-05, 14:39
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 21:46
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)