Modernizing The Spec [Poll]


Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll]
#33
Michael Heidemann Wrote:Please do not change the PT. It is good the way it is today!
It may be good for you, but reviewers still need to check and I usually fix badly-formed headers (with admin edits). I'd like other peoples views on the current state of the trade-off between this extra reviw overhead and the risk of newbie authors getting frustrated and dropping out because they can't meet the header standards.
Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2014-12-27, 14:24
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2014-12-27, 20:15
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2015-01-07, 21:08
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2015-01-07, 21:01
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2015-01-07, 22:19
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Nicola - 2015-01-16, 15:46
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Chris Dee - 2015-11-22, 17:03
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Nicola - 2015-01-19, 14:14

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)