Quote:I would vote for 0.000001 as we usually use a maximum number of 6 decimalsProblem is in the term "maximum"! What happens when the transformation matrix is reduced to the usual 3 or 4 decimals? I would suggest on the contrary to relax the threshold to 0.001 trying to avoid problems. Or to remove completely this requirement that brings absolutely nothing!!!
DATHeader 3.0.18.3 - bugfix version
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
DATHeader 3.0.18.3 - bugfix version - by Michael Heidemann - 2015-09-19, 7:30
Re: DATHeader 3.0.18.3 - bugfix version - by Michael Heidemann - 2015-09-20, 10:31
Re: DATHeader 3.0.18.3 - bugfix version - by Philippe Hurbain - 2015-09-20, 12:11
Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Nils Schmidt - 2015-09-20, 18:11
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Michael Heidemann - 2015-09-21, 17:03
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Nils Schmidt - 2015-09-21, 20:27
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Michael Heidemann - 2015-09-24, 18:07
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Nils Schmidt - 2015-09-25, 8:00
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Michael Heidemann - 2015-09-25, 20:23
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Nils Schmidt - 2015-09-26, 8:27
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Max Martin Richter - 2015-09-21, 21:00
Re: Scaled Flat Subfiles - by Philippe Hurbain - 2015-09-22, 6:54
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)