Hi all.
Using LDraw library from 2012, mainly for developing new utilities, I think backward compatibility is a must.
From other point of view, IMHO, library needs some little improvements:
- more "strict" identification for part files (official and unofficial) against model file. It is somewhat difficult to identify if I'm reading a model (that contains only lines type 1) or a part, that can contains all geometric primitives, graphic primitives and references.
- use of "category" for all parts in library, to ease search for parts by category or by use.
HTH
Mario
Using LDraw library from 2012, mainly for developing new utilities, I think backward compatibility is a must.
From other point of view, IMHO, library needs some little improvements:
- more "strict" identification for part files (official and unofficial) against model file. It is somewhat difficult to identify if I'm reading a model (that contains only lines type 1) or a part, that can contains all geometric primitives, graphic primitives and references.
- use of "category" for all parts in library, to ease search for parts by category or by use.
HTH
Mario