This is not true. It's perfectly reasonable to have a file that only contains type 1 references to primitives, and no local geometry. Such a file would potentially need INVERTNEXT statements.
BFC of mirrored parts?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
BFC of mirrored parts? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2014-12-30, 10:17
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Steffen - 2015-01-02, 19:26
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2015-01-03, 23:41
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Max Martin Richter - 2015-01-04, 0:02
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Travis Cobbs - 2015-01-04, 0:24
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2015-01-04, 10:22
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Chris Dee - 2015-01-04, 21:20
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Travis Cobbs - 2015-01-05, 5:27
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Travis Cobbs - 2015-01-05, 5:25
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Steffen - 2015-01-05, 21:17
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)