Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?


Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
#6
I agree that having everything be CCW makes sense, but I don't agree that this makes things much easier for coding a renderer. Supporting INVERTNEXT requires supporting switching the order of points. Given that constraint, it's pretty trivial to also support CW/CCW.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Travis Cobbs - 2014-11-04, 18:25

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)