I vouch 100% for unifying winding in the library. It's being very VERY frustrating to deal with when coding BFC stuff (which is pretty much why ldforge still doesn't have properly working BFC support). Having a mere toggle for knowing what is BFC-compliant or not would be so much easier to deal with than trying various gross hacks to try keep track of CW/CCW winding... give me the go and I'll convert everything by hand if need be.
LDraw.org Discussion Forums
›
General
›
Official File Specifications/Standards
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2014-11-04, 12:32
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Orion Pobursky - 2014-11-04, 12:39
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Nicola - 2014-11-04, 13:45
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2014-11-04, 14:03
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Santeri Piippo - 2014-11-04, 14:11
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Roland Melkert - 2014-11-04, 22:47
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Travis Cobbs - 2014-11-04, 18:25
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Roland Melkert - 2014-11-04, 22:39
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)