Totally agree that the library should have been completely converted to CCW from the beginning... All primitives were already converted this way some time ago. And indeed, boxes are of very limited benefit except to keep file size down (itself of limited benefit...)!
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2014-11-04, 12:32
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Orion Pobursky - 2014-11-04, 12:39
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Nicola - 2014-11-04, 13:45
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Philippe Hurbain - 2014-11-04, 14:03
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Santeri Piippo - 2014-11-04, 14:11
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Roland Melkert - 2014-11-04, 22:47
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Travis Cobbs - 2014-11-04, 18:25
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Roland Melkert - 2014-11-04, 22:39
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)