axleend2


axleend2
#1
The current PT version is on the left, while another variant using the same number of vertices is on the right. As can be seen from this view, the size of the plus shape is bigger (it extends a little further away from the centre) on the right (salmon colored).

.png   plus.png (Size: 68.77 KB / Downloads: 25)

The length of the orange bar (below) is closer to the shape on the right (above) than the shape on the left (above).

.png   aend.png (Size: 10.64 KB / Downloads: 25)
The black dots in the picture above form an almost perfect quarter circle.
The red dots above show the tapering - the narrowing of the axle main fins.

In this view (below), aided by the magenta plane slicing thru the middle, we see that the curvature at the plane is more round on the right than on the left.

.png   plane.png (Size: 44.7 KB / Downloads: 25)
Finally, the tapering is visible on the left (green vertexes), while absent on the right (yellow vertexes has no tapering).

I claim that without adding more vertexes, one cannot satisfy both a) and b) where a) is the tapering, and b) is the roundedness along the magenta plane combined with a larger plus shape.
Reply
RE: axleend2
#2
Unless it is done like this (the rightmost half with green top and light blue tapering):


.png   unle.png (Size: 48.79 KB / Downloads: 19)

3 16 1.56 1.09 -5.04 2 2.5 -5.6 2 2.5 -2
3 16 1.56 1.09 -5.04 2 2.5 -2 1.38 .5 -3.62
3 16 1.38 .5 -3.62 2 2.5 -2 1.38 .5 -1.38
4 16 1.56 1.09 -5.04 1.38 .5 -3.62 0 .5 -3.9 0 1.09 -5.35
4 9 2 2.5 -5.6 1.56 1.09 -5.04 0 1.09 -5.35 0 2.5 -6
4 2 0 .5 0 0 .5 -3.9 1.38 .5 -3.62 1.38 .5 -1.38
Reply
RE: axleend2
#3
I love the attention to detail. That said, these details are so small that I question whether this discussion is even worth the trouble.
Reply
RE: axleend2
#4
Also note, that is the tapering extends outward, the axle might collide in some of the newer 60deg axle joiners
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)