LDraw.org Discussion Forums
[Complete] Part 87079pb0018 - Printable Version

+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: Models and Parts (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-18.html)
+--- Forum: Part Requests (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-30.html)
+--- Thread: [Complete] Part 87079pb0018 (/thread-25786.html)



Part 87079pb0018 - LuongNguyen - 2021-12-26

Can anyone find part  87079pb0018 for me please  Angel
[Image: 87079pb0018.png]


RE: Part 87079pb0018 - Philippe Hurbain - 2021-12-26

Sure, I did it several years ago Wink

https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=87079p01


RE: Part 87079pb0018 - LuongNguyen - 2021-12-26

(2021-12-26, 8:19)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Sure, I did it several years ago Wink

https://www.ldraw.org/parts/official-part-lookup.html?folder=parts&partid=87079p01

wow thank you!!! I've been searching for this part in ldraw but there are too many 2 x 4 patterned parts so I can't find it


RE: Part 87079pb0018 - Orion Pobursky - 2021-12-26

(2021-12-26, 7:21)LuongNguyen Wrote: Can anyone find part  87079pb0018 for me please  Angel
[Image: 87079pb0018.png]

Note: this is a perfect reason why I think a Bricklink or Rebrickable number !KEYWORD should be required for all patterned parts. I realize I got overruled last time but I'll continue to highlight reasons why we should do it.


RE: Part 87079pb0018 - N. W. Perry - 2021-12-26

(2021-12-26, 15:24)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Note: this is a perfect reason why I think a Bricklink or Rebrickable number !KEYWORD should be required for all patterned parts. I realize I got overruled last time but I'll continue to highlight reasons why we should do it.

And also a perfect example of where the patterned part summary tool comes in very handy. In fact, in this case it's the very first part listed.


RE: Part 87079pb0018 - Philippe Hurbain - 2021-12-26

(2021-12-26, 15:24)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Note: this is a perfect reason why I think a Bricklink or Rebrickable number !KEYWORD should be required for all patterned parts. I realize I got overruled last time but I'll continue to highlight reasons why we should do it.

Agreed. The problem with listing set number(s) is that it can't be exhaustive (if only because the pattern may appear in later sets). This makes the search more difficult.