61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html) +--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap (/thread-23953.html) |
61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Orion Pobursky - 2020-03-24 Looks like we need to adjust either 61678 or 41479/41750 as they currently overlap and shouldn't. RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Philippe Hurbain - 2020-03-24 (2020-03-24, 19:06)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Looks like we need to adjust either 61678 or 41479/41750 as they currently overlap and shouldn't.Tricky one official parts, patterned/stickered parts, other compatibility to consider... RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Orion Pobursky - 2020-03-24 (2020-03-24, 19:55)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Tricky one Probably 61678 that needs to be adjusted. Looks like 1 pattern and 4 stickers for 61678 (plus shortcuts) RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Magnus Forsberg - 2020-03-24 (2020-03-24, 20:57)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Probably 61678 that needs to be adjusted. If that one changes, the similar part 39606 need the same change too. RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Gerald Lasser - 2020-03-24 (2020-03-24, 22:21)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: If that one changes, the similar part 39606 need the same change too. Which part do you mean? I cannot find 39606. RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Magnus Forsberg - 2020-03-25 (2020-03-24, 23:33)Gerald Lasser Wrote: Which part do you mean? I cannot find 39606. Sorry. I flipped the two first digits. I mean 93606. It's the 2x4 version of 61678. RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Philippe Hurbain - 2020-03-25 I propose to modify the top (and side chrd) of 93606/61678 using the following procedure: - Rotate it by arcsin(20/80)=14.4775° - scale the curve in y direction by 0.7644 - Rotate back by -14.4775° This way we flatten the curve and follow the one of 41750. Benefit of using a mathematical procedure is that we can apply it to patterns without breaking them. Code: 1 16 10 116.29494599103998803316728557974 31.490267046659552477501919974163 0 -20 0 -116.29494599103998803316728557964 0 9.122478426125247757831783698656 8.509732953340447522498080025883 0 -157.64458619863203130008139786518 48\1-12cylo.dat RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Gerald Lasser - 2020-03-25 I think there is more to this: It seems that 46413 and 41749 are done with 42022 in mind 45705 looks to be more in line with 61678 Do we need to change 45705 as well? Code: 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 42022.dat RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Philippe Hurbain - 2020-03-25 I guess so... RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Gerald Lasser - 2020-03-26 (2020-03-25, 17:36)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: I guess so... Any more interactions of those parts? Trying to think which other ones would be affected. I will scan both parts tomorrow, to check the exact measurement. RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Gerald Lasser - 2020-03-26 Here's the overlay, looks like the 4 x 1 is closer to the original RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Magnus Forsberg - 2020-08-28 (2020-03-26, 13:41)Gerald Lasser Wrote: Here's the overlay, looks like the 4 x 1 is closer to the original 41749/41750 are now in the PT and in need of an overhaul. https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/s/41749s01.dat How should we continue? RE: 61678 and 41749/41750 overlap - Gerald Lasser - 2020-08-28 I would go for an adaptation toward the curve of the 61678 (1 x 4) There are no stickered parts in the library for 42022/41762, so also adapting those would not be too much of an impact, or did I overlook something? |