Hi . I'm wondering if there is a parts CDN to be used with the ThreeJS LdrawLoader, (or if I can host one). I know there is some on GitHub, however most of them have not been updated in years, and I can't find an updated one. (gkjohnson/ldraw-parts-library on GitHub is what I found, but as a stated before, has not been updated in 2 years)

Also sorry for posting in off topic, I don't know what category this belongs in other than parts and I'm pretty sure that's for requesting new parts/issues with part models.

Hey, I'm new here and wanted to ask if someone here knows if the part 105005pb01 (Link Hair with Slouchy Hat) is being worked on by someone.
I saw some websites online, that have a 3d version of that part, but I can't find it anywhere.
Does anyone know where I could find it or if someone is working on it (discord maybe?)



([url=https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=105005pb01&idColor=110#T=S&C=110&O={"color":110,"iconly":0}]https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=105005pb01&idColor=110#T=S&C=110&O={"color":110,"iconly":0}[/url])

Hello,
I want to take snapshots with LDView. For this purpose, I have saved the required settings in an INI file. The ldr file, the INI file, and the LDView64.exe program are located in the same directory.
The call looks like this: LDView64.exe 157.ldr -IniFile=Settings.ini.
It seems as if the INI file is not being used. A BFC=0 entry in the INI file has no effect. For example, if the call looks like this, the result is as expected: LDView64.exe 157.ldr -BFC=0.
What am I doing wrong?
I am using LDView 4.5 and Windows 10.

Regards

Manfred

Is this good enough to get added to the part tracker etc?

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...2#T=C&C=86

This part is in 1 new set: 75429-1 AT-AT Driver Helmet, so far.

Attached Files

  5842.dat (Size: 41.11 KB / Downloads: 2)

Here are the raw files for the new joint with some correction of the origin.

Feel free to go ahead, I am a bit tied up rgiht now..

Attached Files

  69790_raw.dat (Size: 171.89 KB / Downloads: 8)
  69787_raw.dat (Size: 142.17 KB / Downloads: 3)
  69788_raw.dat (Size: 225.95 KB / Downloads: 3)
  69789_raw.dat (Size: 206.13 KB / Downloads: 3)

Hello,
I found that for part 4488 there seem to be various versions: 4488, 10313 and 67688.
 I'm not quite sure about the codes.

In some sites 4488 and 10313 are indicated as aliases, but looking at the images of the lower part they are different, with two or three fins.

The difference between 4488 and 67688 is clearly shown in Rebrickable. The center hole doesn't seem useful for inserting parts, but it's just a material saver. For us, it's just a small aesthetic change that could be omitted.

Is it worth working on?



I am attaching some images and a first model that I have prepared.
It is not yet ready for publication and perhaps the names of the primitives should be revised a bit.


Massimo

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
           

  Ebay 4488.jpg (Size: 7.38 KB / Downloads: 68)
  Ebay 10313 (but named 4488).jpg (Size: 14.51 KB / Downloads: 68)
  Archive.zip (Size: 7.34 KB / Downloads: 1)

Hey there, I just found an element that isn’t on LDraw yet. It was first used for the Dreamzzz theme with printing. 




https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/cat...P=6957pb01


I would also like a blank version without printing as well, which I know you’ll obviously add. Thank you for reading my part request!

There is a Duplo stud shape in between stud8 and stud28, i.e. where the inside has two straight segments on opposite sides of the circle. Stud8 has no straight segments and stud28 has four straight segments. The 2-straight segmented shape occurs at least in the picket fence 6497. I'd like to create the 2-straight segmented shape as stud38. Any objections?

Another variant has 4 small notches in each of the 45, 135, 225, and 315 degree angles. Occurs at least in the ladder 3519. Would be convenient to have such a stud primitive on hand.

Edit: Corrected stud8 name.

Deleted content because the info was wrong.

I find myself repeatedly adding edges and discs of the same size and shape. Would it be useful to have a 'disco' series similar to the cylo series?