Aligning Categories to user expectations


Re: Aligning Categories to user expectations
#6
From my (outdated) notes, I would make the minimum following suggestions:

Unofficial categories which should be added to the official list
Cockpit now in the official list
Duplo (personally recommend only one Duplo category)
Fabuland
String

Official categories which should not exist
Gate already gone
Jack already gone

Brand new Categories which are needed
Brick, Decorated
Primo (Currently in Duplo; part descriptions should be updated to remove "Duplo")
Quatro (no bricks exist yet)
Slope, Decorated
Tile, Decorated

As much as possible, part descriptions should align with the categories in which they reside.

An alternative to defining decorated categories is to expect the program to identify patterned parts and auto-generate subcategories for them, either based on the part naming convention (is it 100% consistent?) or a new meta. Generally I favor explicitly-defined data over tricks like this, so I think I favor making decorations real categories.

And of course, any parts currently in de-facto unofficial categories should be moved into real categories as quickly as possible. That's a important for making !CATEGORY ready for production use.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Aligning Categories to user expectations - by Allen Smith - 2013-08-29, 16:58

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)