Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives


Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives
#45
Santeri Piippo Wrote:I think we should be consistent with LDConfig.ldr's !COLOUR definitions even though if we wouldn't be able to add these meta-commands directly into it. With !COLOUR, tags don't necessarily need values, there's attributes like PEARLESCENT, METAL, CHROME and RUBBER. Thus, by analogy, this would have such attributes like STUDLOGOS and DEFAULT.

Hi Santeri,

Let me ask you this: if a client does not have a complete list of keywords (but does know whether, for any _known_ keyword, the keyword has a value associated), what is the correct algorithm for parsing the line/skipping unknown tags?

cheers
ben
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Parsable Meta-Data for High-detail vs. Low-detail parts and primitives - by Ben Supnik - 2013-08-21, 15:33

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)