Texture Mapping extension


Re: Texture Mapping extension
#70
Allen Smith Wrote:Step #2 is more debatable. However, in the spirit of how LDraw works, unrecognized type 0 lines devolve into comments. Since neither line in Step #2 has meaning without being prefaced by a TEXMAP START, I consider them stray junk in the file rather than parsing errors.

I agree. Any 0 !: lines that appear when not in the context of an active TEXMAP should be ignored. Assuming we ratify your suggestion of having STEP abort the texture, these would be ignored.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-04-14, 22:08
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-10-26, 19:34
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-15, 22:51
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-30, 21:55

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)