Is "Pattern" superfluous in Sticker part names?

Re: Is "Pattern" superfluous in Sticker part names?
I see...the word Name means Description here (and in the specification)...

In that case, if Sticker is in the Description, than I don't think Pattern also needs to be in the Description.

Perhaps we could persuade the LSC to update the spec to mandate that the first word(s) in the description be the part category...preferably as categorized by Bricklink. The remainder of the description should be the Bricklink description and / or words that are more descriptive of the part.

Feel free to shoot me over the Bricklink description, but I would like to stand by their categorization key words. Our current categories don't mirror anyone else and don't always make sense. It would be wise to align our category key words with that of our patron's largest part supplier.

Scott W.
SteerCo Member
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Re: Is "Pattern" superfluous in Sticker part names? - by Scott Wardlaw - 2011-12-19, 16:47

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)