RE: Is it OK that parts are deleted from unofficial library?
2021-03-11, 16:12 (This post was last modified: 2021-03-11, 16:14 by Magnus Forsberg.)
2021-03-11, 16:12 (This post was last modified: 2021-03-11, 16:14 by Magnus Forsberg.)
The simple answer is: Yes.
The problem with this "part" was that 5306 is a setnumber. The correct number for this part is 75652.
Here it is:
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../75652.dat
I reworked the wire too, to be more like the other parts in this family.
72631c01
72631c02
72632c01
72632c02
72633c01
72633c02
72634c01
72634c02
The number 5306 is placed as a keyword in the file, since it was present under that number a long time.
The problem with this "part" was that 5306 is a setnumber. The correct number for this part is 75652.
Here it is:
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.c.../75652.dat
I reworked the wire too, to be more like the other parts in this family.
72631c01
72631c02
72632c01
72632c02
72633c01
72633c02
72634c01
72634c02
The number 5306 is placed as a keyword in the file, since it was present under that number a long time.