(2020-07-28, 19:49)Jaco van der Molen Wrote: Indeed I agree that 61287p01_longitude.dat will work best. I will do some testing again tomorrow!
But don't you think we should match the image, instead of the geometry?
2 subfiles are now at the Part Tracker.
https://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptscan.cgi...escription
Attatched here is a file with correct position on the part and texmap. It might still need some finetuning.
I've extended the printed surface to include some of the bottom. It is actually also printed.
Shouldn't the tan part of the image be transparent?