What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker


RE: What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker
#74
(2019-05-27, 11:04)Chris Dee Wrote: How do you envisage a WARNING vote affecting the certification status? To override the reviewers existing CERT vote, like a Comment, or should it add another vote letter that nees to be cleared before the part can be released? The latter would be complex to implement but could potentially be rolled into a much-needed Parts Tracker redevelopment.

Alternatively, and much simpler to implement, could it work like a comment but automatically email the PT admin for atttention. In which case merely adding a 'Send comment to admin' checkbox to the review page   would be even easier to implement and of more general applicability as it could be used on other vote types (e.g. HOLD votes to request deletions, CERT votes to warn of dependencies).

I see WARNING as a comment on a HOLD, CERTIFY, or NOVOTE. These aren't necessarily errors but may be poor style, minor improvements that don't really need to be fixed, or stuff that the admin can fix.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: What requires a HOLD vote on the Parts Tracker - by Orion Pobursky - 2019-05-27, 14:45

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)