Proposed new LDRAW_ORG qualifier for Lsynth subparts


RE: Proposed new LDRAW_ORG qualifier for Lsynth subparts
#12
(2017-08-16, 10:43)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: The problem is not strictly a problem with Lsynth! People using cad system without flex part extension (mlcad, leocad) might want to "manually" build custom flex parts using segments. Tedious, but rather easy, done that many times in the past... So the segments MUST be in parts folder to be accessible by users! That's why I find Chris proposal to be a good one (none of these older cad system cares about real part type)

While I can think of using http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cg...s/572d.dat I really can't for http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=680. I also think that they aren't either Parts or Subparts but something in between and support Chris proposal.

Nonetheless, LSynth should look into more folders than just Parts.

w.
LEGO ergo sum
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proposed new LDRAW_ORG qualifier for Lsynth subparts - by Willy Tschager - 2017-08-16, 13:09

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)