Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it


RE: Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it
#13
I choose wxWidgets over Qt because of the license as I wanted to statically link into a single executable (it's my Delphi background leaking through Smile )

Also I only use a limited amount of stuff from wxWidgets (mainly zip, png and filemonitoring), and none of the supporting stuff like strings, lists etc as I like to write those myself as part of the hobby aspect of LDCad.

I do believe wxWidgets delivers truly native dialogs though, including the file browser one on Windows.

I won't expect people to jump on and start coding as understanding 155 thousands lines including many custom utility classes might be a bit  time consuming Smile

The main thing I hope to get from Open Sourcing is a broader range of supported os's as people can compile it themselves if none of the pre-compiled versions suit their needs.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Thinking about LDCad 2.0 and open sourcing it - by Roland Melkert - 2016-05-31, 18:41

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)