Part 87580 Naming


Re: Part 87580 Naming
#2
Not sure I agree. It is more tile than plate by three to one.

Although by that argument 6576 should be a tile too and arguably 88000.

Tim
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Part 87580 Naming - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-05, 4:51
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 5:34
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Chris Dee - 2011-12-05, 13:59
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 14:20
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Orion Pobursky - 2011-12-05, 14:39
Re: Part 87580 Naming - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-05, 21:46

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)