LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans


RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans
(2017-11-12, 20:02)David Manley Wrote:
(2017-11-08, 12:44)Jaco van der Molen Wrote: Hope you know what I mean?

Hi Jaco,

one possible approach is to name of the sub-models with some form of numeric prefix. I put a two-part numeric prefix as part of my models' name and my main model is always numbered 0. For example;

000-00-main
010-00-foundation
010-10-foundation_01
010-20-foundation_02
010-30-transfer_shaft
...
050-00-input_box
050-10-input_wall_left
...

This allows me to control the sequence and group "like" sub-models together. Where a sub-model is formed by a group of other smaller sub-models, I name the top of the sub-model group with a "-00-" (e.g. 010-00-foundation) and the smaller related sub-models in increments of 10 (e.g. 010-10-foundation_01). I use increments of 10 for the sub-models as it provides an allowance in the numbering if a sub-model is subsequently split (e.g. I can add sub-models with prefixes of 010-12- and 010-14 without requiring any renumbering).

Regards,

David

OK, good suggestion. Nice approach. I will give this some thought. Thanks.
Jaco van der Molen
lpub.binarybricks.nl
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: LDCad 1.6 ROTSTEP feedback - by TestOne - 2016-02-25, 22:56
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Kai - 2016-05-23, 18:48
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Art - 2016-08-11, 12:56
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Art - 2016-08-12, 7:29
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Karen M - 2017-10-24, 10:28
RE: LDCad 1.6 suggestions/plans - by Jaco van der Molen - 2017-11-13, 20:53

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)