BFC of mirrored parts?


Re: BFC of mirrored parts?
#9
This is not true. It's perfectly reasonable to have a file that only contains type 1 references to primitives, and no local geometry. Such a file would potentially need INVERTNEXT statements.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
BFC of mirrored parts? - by Magnus Forsberg - 2014-12-30, 10:17
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Steffen - 2015-01-02, 19:26
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Chris Dee - 2015-01-04, 21:20
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Travis Cobbs - 2015-01-05, 5:27
Re: BFC of mirrored parts? - by Steffen - 2015-01-05, 21:17

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)