Modernizing The Spec [Poll]


Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll]
#11
As I wrote in at least one review in the past, sometimes I wish to had a LDraw 2.0, where all the origin problems, moved-to references, obsolete files, wrong part numbers, etc. could get compensated.
Of course I'm ok with the style of the 1.0 format, but we could add even more information in meta commands and/or correct some other issues (like technic peghole position) there.
So I would prefer something like dat2, basically made as dat, but with more metas and corrected files...
If needed a xml-file for a raw conversion of older models should work as well...

/Max
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2014-12-27, 14:24
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2014-12-27, 20:15
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2015-01-07, 21:08
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Max Martin Richter - 2015-01-02, 10:23
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2015-01-07, 21:01
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Steffen - 2015-01-07, 22:19
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Nicola - 2015-01-16, 15:46
Re: Modernizing The Spec [Poll] - by Nicola - 2015-01-19, 14:14

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)