Naming scheme for primitives - update

Re: Naming scheme for primitives - update
Yes, that is true. With LDFind I made a quick search for 'ring' and found:
Hi-Res Ring 40 x 0.2292 C:\ldraw\p\48\11-48r40.dat
Hi-Res Ring 42 x 0.0833 C:\ldraw\p\48\1-12ri42.dat
Ring 11 x 0.25 C:\ldraw\p\1-4rin11.dat
Ring 8 x 0.375 C:\ldraw\p\3-8ring8.dat

So for ring we have at least 'r', 'ri', 'rin' and 'ring' already in our library.

I believe that for the other primitives we will have similar results. So we need to solve this problem first.

I would go with:
Keep the already official files like they are. Introduce the new naming scheme quickly for new primitives.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Re: Naming scheme for primitives - update - by Michael Heidemann - 2014-08-11, 20:09

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)