Max Martin Richter Wrote:When I re-build an official model, I really look for the correct part types, whenever possible...
Me too, but not by searching a (possible wrong or inconsistent) description, but the part name. The part name is the most reliable component. Titles and texts are very often inconsistent over time.
I already did some head patterns that are official now, and none of them contain the stud type as text. And no one noticed. If that was a fault, it shows how difficult it is to maintain all these unwritten rules when reviewing parts. I have seen parts on hold for redundant information, and here it should be mandatory?