Aligning Categories to user expectations


Re: Aligning Categories to user expectations
#13
ah, yes, thank you.

yes, that list IMHO lacks the mentioned categories.

Fabuland:
there are not many Fabuland-specific parts. Mainly the big house building panels, the figures
and some accessories.
Yes, the shovel for example later appeared in another set, but the predominant existence
definetely was Fabuland.

Pov-Ray:
I think we should _not_ add this as official category.
We in the past have removed all POVRay-specific stuff (like inline POVRay code) from our parts.
So I suggest to prepend a ~ to the only file (light.dat) and obsoletize it.

EDIT: I changed my mind, see above

String:
yes, let's have this as new category!
do we also need "Rubberband"?

Duplo:
There do not exist too many Duplo parts.
You usually want to have them all available together.
You'll not want to look in "Train" for the Duplo Train parts.
I clearly favor to have all Duplo stuff in ONE category.

Primo:
the same analogously
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Aligning Categories to user expectations - by Steffen - 2013-08-29, 21:36

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)