The Case for Underside Fillet Primitives


Re: The Case for Underside Fillet Primitives
#9
Please don't. Only stud* primitives need lo-res stu2* equivalents.

There is no value in having a low-res version of a primitive which only includes rectilinear surfaces and a linetype 1 call to an existing primitive (stud4f*.dat). When set in lo-res mode a renderer should do the stud4f* -> stu24f* substitution regardless of how deeply that primitive is nested in the call hierarchy. As I explained here, that's why these primitives should not be named stud*.
Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: The Case for Underside Fillet Primitives - by Chris Dee - 2013-08-13, 19:43

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)