LDMakeList V2.0


Re: LDMakeList V2.0
#25
Hi Roland,

Firstly, Mike will have to answer about why he chose that name, but to me it definitely makes sense to start from %LDRAWDIR%.

Presently the type of slash is system dependent (in principle LDMakeList is OS independent, you just need to change a #define to reverse the slash). But as I recall any valid LDraw code should be able to read either \ or / as a separator for parts. The filename rules for parts are pretty strict to avoid problems. So it shouldn't matter which type is used Smile

So the rule is: parts.xml will have the slash of the OS it was created on, and it will always feature trailing slashes to avoid problems with badly defined %LDRAWDIR%.

Tim
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-07, 23:09
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Max Martin Richter - 2013-02-07, 23:37
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-07, 23:42
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Max Martin Richter - 2013-02-07, 23:54
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-07, 23:55
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Travis Cobbs - 2013-02-08, 0:24
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-08, 0:32
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Willy Tschager - 2013-02-08, 9:25
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-08, 9:59
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Philippe Hurbain - 2013-02-08, 12:55
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-08, 21:48
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-09, 8:58
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-09, 22:31
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-09, 23:12
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-10, 0:16
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-10, 13:21
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-10, 23:00
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-11, 16:28
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-16, 8:40
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-16, 11:27
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-16, 22:38
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-16, 23:38
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-17, 0:38
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-17, 13:46
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Roland Melkert - 2013-02-16, 23:50
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-17, 0:33
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-17, 14:19
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Roland Melkert - 2013-02-17, 17:33
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-17, 18:10
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-17, 21:49
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Travis Cobbs - 2013-02-17, 3:53
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-17, 9:44
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-17, 13:58
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-17, 21:35
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-17, 13:43
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Roland Melkert - 2013-02-17, 17:20
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-02-17, 17:53
Update Re: LDMakeList V2.01 - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-23, 22:41
Re: LDMakeList V2.0 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-09-06, 20:26
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Tim Gould - 2013-09-06, 21:23
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-09-06, 21:33
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-09-08, 12:22
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Tim Gould - 2013-09-08, 12:40
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-09-08, 13:50
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2013-09-08, 14:06
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Michael Heidemann - 2013-09-08, 15:50
Re: LDMakeList V2.13 - by Tim Gould - 2013-09-09, 2:28

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)