[LSC Request] End of header meta command


Re: Call for LSC Vote Re: [LSC Request] End of header meta command
#79
I do not see the presentation issue big enough
to justify the introduction of a new !EOH keyword.
It's just a small, cosmetic issue which can be easily solved by polishing the affected mentioned 154 parts
and/or extending the PT logic.
We should avoid keyword clutter.
Introducing new keywords can be become an addiction.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Call for LSC Vote Re: [LSC Request] End of header meta command - by Steffen - 2014-01-15, 0:29

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)