[Thoughts wanted] Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst


Re: [Thoughts wanted] UPDATE: Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst
#20
Already changed in V3.

What I would ideally like to see is the same basic format used for XML representations of the parts, with additional details added as necessary. Right now Mike and I seem to be using the same (or equivalent) representations. Once a de facto standard is in place we could look at officialising it, thus reducing the coding workload of future programs.

Tim
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: [Thoughts wanted] UPDATE: Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-04, 2:10

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)