Texture Mapping extension


Re: Texture Mapping extension
#73
I realized in reading over some of this thread today what some of our misunderstandings have been...

7 and 8, the way we set up the spec (only in part files, TEXMAP is meant to bind decorations to parts instead of "design-by-architecture" means) shouldn't be an issue. The idea was to have a design encapsulated within a part definition, and the texture stack support was only for the very rare case that an s part need to have nested textures upon them, while the part using the s portion also was in the middle of a texture definition. So STEP shouldn't happen in the middle of a TEXMAP definition.

- joshua
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-04-14, 22:08
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Joshua Delahunty - 2012-10-26, 20:27
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-15, 22:51
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-30, 21:55

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)